
EPYC 7573X

EPYC 8534P
EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 8534P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 8534P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 8534P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7573X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (69,432 vs 71,900).
- ❌1.1% HIGHER MSRP$5,590 MSRPvs$5,529 MSRP
- ❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 8534P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
EPYC 8534P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+3.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($5,529 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7573X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 768 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 8534P better than EPYC 7573X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 8534P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7573X
The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.

EPYC 8534P
The EPYC 8534P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 71,900 points. Launch price was $4,950.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7573X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 8534P offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 8534P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8534P — a 14.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 7573X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 7573X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 8534P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7573X scores 69,432 against the EPYC 8534P's 71,900 — a 3.5% lead for the EPYC 8534P. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7573X vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8534P.
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | EPYC 8534P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 64 / 128+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+16% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+22% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+500% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 69,432 | 71,900+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,678 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,882 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7573X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 8534P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7573X versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 8534P — the EPYC 8534P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7573X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1152 GB — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7573X) vs 6 (EPYC 8534P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7573X) vs 96 (EPYC 8534P) — the EPYC 7573X offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7573X) and SP6 (EPYC 8534P).
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | EPYC 8534P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+256% | 1152 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+33% | 96 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 8534P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7573X) vs AMD-V (EPYC 8534P). Primary use case: EPYC 8534P targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; EPYC 8534P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | EPYC 8534P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Cloud Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7573X was priced at $5590, while the EPYC 8534P came in at $5529. On launch pricing ($5590 vs $5529), EPYC 8534P was $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7573X delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 8534P — making the EPYC 8534P the 4.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | EPYC 8534P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5590 | $5529-1% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | 13.0+5% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















