EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7662
EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 7662 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 7662 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 7662: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7573X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Costs $560 less on MSRP ($5,590 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (69,432 vs 72,298).
- ❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.
EPYC 7662
2020Why buy it
- ✅+4.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7573X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌10% HIGHER MSRP$6,150 MSRPvs$5,590 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7573X better than EPYC 7662?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 7662 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7573X
The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.
EPYC 7662
The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7573X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 7662 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7662 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 7573X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7573X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 7662 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7573X scores 69,432 against the EPYC 7662's 72,298 — a 4% lead for the EPYC 7662. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7573X vs 256 MB on the EPYC 7662.
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 64 / 128+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+40% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+200% | 256 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+1500% | 32 MB |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 69,432 | 72,298+4% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7573X) and SP3 (EPYC 7662).
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7573X was priced at $5590, while the EPYC 7662 came in at $6150. On launch pricing ($5590 vs $6150), EPYC 7573X was $560 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7573X delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 7662 — making the EPYC 7573X the 5.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5590-9% | $6150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4+5% | 11.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7573X and EPYC 7662
