EPYC 7573X vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7573X

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

32 Cores64 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7573X vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7573X

32 / 64

69,432

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

32 / 64

68,643

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7573X vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7573X vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7573X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
❌36.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 205W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,595 less on MSRP ($3,995 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
✅Draws 205W instead of 280W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7573X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (68,643 vs 69,432).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7573X better than Xeon Platinum 8352Y?

Yes. EPYC 7573X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7573X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 768 MB versus 48 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7573X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7573X is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8352Y is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7573X comes in 39.9% more expensive on MSRP at $5,590 MSRP versus $3,995 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Platinum 8352Y is also 38.3% better value on MSRP (17.2 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7573X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 768 MB L3 cache instead of 48 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7573X vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7573X

The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7573X and Xeon Platinum 8352Y share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — a 5.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 7573X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7573X is built on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7573X scores 69,432 against the Xeon Platinum 8352Y's 68,643 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 7573X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7573X vs 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+6%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+27%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+1500%	48 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Milan-X (2022)	—
PassMark	69,432+1%	68,643

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7573X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7573X) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) — the EPYC 7573X offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7573X) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y).

Feature	EPYC 7573X	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7573X was priced at $5590, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y came in at $3995. On launch pricing ($5590 vs $3995), Xeon Platinum 8352Y was $1595 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7573X delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — making the Xeon Platinum 8352Y the 32.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
MSRP	$5590	$3995-29%
Performance per Dollar	12.4	17.2+39%
Release Date	2022	2021

Search EPYC 7573X on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8352Y on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.