EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 9384X

EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 9384X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7573X

32 / 64

69,432

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 9384X

32 / 64

72,121

+3.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9955HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 9384X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 9384X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7573X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 280W instead of 320W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (69,432 vs 72,121).
❌
1.1% HIGHER MSRP
$5,590 MSRPvs$5,529 MSRP
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9384X moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9384X

2023

Why buy it

✅+3.9% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($5,529 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7573X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9384X better than EPYC 7573X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7573X is ahead with a 10.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9384X pulls ahead with 3.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9384X is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.9% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9384X is the better buy right now. EPYC 9384X comes in $61 cheaper on MSRP at $5,529 MSRP versus $5,590 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 7573X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 5.0% better value on MSRP (13.0 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9384X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 32/64, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 9384X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7573X

The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.

EPYC 9384X

The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7573X and EPYC 9384X share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X — a 8% clock advantage for the EPYC 9384X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 7573X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 9384X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7573X scores 69,432 against the EPYC 9384X's 72,121 — a 3.8% lead for the EPYC 9384X. Both processors carry 768 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	EPYC 9384X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)	768 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Milan-X (2022)	Genoa-X (2023)
PassMark	69,432	72,121+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7573X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9384X uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7573X versus 4800 on the EPYC 9384X — the EPYC 9384X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9384X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7573X) vs 12 (EPYC 9384X). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7573X) and SP5 (EPYC 9384X).

Feature	EPYC 7573X	EPYC 9384X
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9384X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7573X) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9384X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	EPYC 9384X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7573X was priced at $5590, while the EPYC 9384X came in at $5529. On launch pricing ($5590 vs $5529), EPYC 9384X was $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7573X delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 9384X — making the EPYC 9384X the 4.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	EPYC 9384X
MSRP	$5590	$5529-1%
Performance per Dollar	12.4	13.0+5%
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 7573X on Amazon

Search EPYC 9384X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.