EPYC 9135 vs Xeon W-3365
EPYC 9135
Xeon W-3365
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9135
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3365
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9135 | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($95) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,499) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-W (2021) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9135 | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+3615%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($95) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,499) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9135 and Xeon W-3365
EPYC 9135
The EPYC 9135 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,808 points. Launch price was $1,214.
Xeon W-3365
The Xeon W-3365 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,312 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9135 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3365 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon W-3365 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9135 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3365 — a 7.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9135 (base: 3.65 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9135 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-3365 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9135 scores 57,808 against the Xeon W-3365's 57,312 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 9135. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9135 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3365.
| Feature | EPYC 9135 | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.65 GHz+35% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+33% | 48 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 57,808 | 57,312 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 16,817 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9135 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3365 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9135 versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3365 — the EPYC 9135 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9135 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9135) vs 8 (Xeon W-3365). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9135) vs 64 (Xeon W-3365) — the EPYC 9135 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9135) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3365).
| Feature | EPYC 9135 | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6000+149900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 4096 GB+69904967% |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9135) vs true (Xeon W-3365). Direct competitor: EPYC 9135 rivals Xeon Platinum 8558P; Xeon W-3365 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | EPYC 9135 | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9135 launched at $1214 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3365 debuted at $3499. At current prices ($95 vs $3499), the EPYC 9135 is $3404 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9135 delivers 608.5 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3365 — making the EPYC 9135 the 189.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9135 | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1214-65% | $3499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $95-97% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 608.5+3610% | 16.4 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9135 and Xeon W-3365
