EPYC 9135 vs Xeon w7-3545

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9135

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-3545

24 Cores48 Thrd310 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9135 vs Xeon w7-3545 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9135

16 / 32

57,808

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w7-3545

24 / 48

58,453

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9135 vs Xeon w7-3545 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9135 vs Xeon w7-3545: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9135

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $825 less on MSRP ($1,214 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
✅Delivers 66.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.6 vs 28.7 PassMark/$ ($1,214 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 310W, a 110W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3545 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (57,808 vs 58,453).

Xeon w7-3545

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.7 vs 47.6 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).
❌55% higher power demand at 310W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3545 better than EPYC 9135?

Yes. Xeon w7-3545 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 15.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-3545 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3545 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-3545 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9135 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w7-3545 comes in 68.0% more expensive on MSRP at $2,039 MSRP versus $1,214 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9135 is also 66.1% better value on MSRP (47.6 vs 28.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9135 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9135 vs Xeon w7-3545 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9135

The EPYC 9135 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,808 points. Launch price was $1,214.

Xeon w7-3545

The Xeon w7-3545 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 310 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 58,453 points. Launch price was $2,039.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9135 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w7-3545 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon w7-3545 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9135 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3545 — a 11% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3545 (base: 3.65 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9135 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w7-3545 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9135 scores 57,808 against the Xeon w7-3545's 58,453 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon w7-3545. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9135 vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3545.

Feature	EPYC 9135	Xeon w7-3545
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	3.65 GHz+35%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	67.5 MB+5%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	57,808	58,453+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,200

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9135 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-3545 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9135 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3545 — the EPYC 9135 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9135 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9135) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3545). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9135) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3545) — the EPYC 9135 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9135) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3545).

Feature	EPYC 9135	Xeon w7-3545
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	6000+25%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3545 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9135) vs true (Xeon w7-3545). Direct competitor: EPYC 9135 rivals Xeon Platinum 8558P; Xeon w7-3545 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 9135	Xeon w7-3545
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9135 was priced at $1214, while the Xeon w7-3545 came in at $2039. On launch pricing ($1214 vs $2039), EPYC 9135 was $825 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9135 delivers 47.6 pts/$ vs 28.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3545 — making the EPYC 9135 the 49.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9135	Xeon w7-3545
MSRP	$1214-40%	$2039
Performance per Dollar	47.6+66%	28.7
Release Date	2024	2023

Search EPYC 9135 on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3545 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.