EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9474F

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9474F Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9455P

48 / 96

116,926

+14.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

EPYC 9474F

48 / 96

102,255

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9474F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9474F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9455P

2024

Why buy it

✅+14.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,961 less on MSRP ($4,819 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).
✅Delivers 60.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($4,819 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).
✅Draws 300W instead of 360W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9474F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

EPYC 9474F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (102,255 vs 116,926).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 24.3 PassMark/$ ($6,780 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).
❌20% higher power demand at 360W vs 300W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9455P better than EPYC 9474F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9474F is ahead with a 10.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9455P pulls ahead with 14.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9455P is the stronger fit. You are getting 14.3% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9455P is the better buy right now. EPYC 9455P comes in $1,961 cheaper on MSRP at $4,819 MSRP versus $6,780 MSRP, and it still gives you 14.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9474F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 60.9% better value on MSRP (24.3 vs 15.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9455P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 48/96. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9474F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9455P

The EPYC 9455P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 116,926 points. Launch price was $4,819.

EPYC 9474F

The EPYC 9474F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 102,255 points. Launch price was $6,780.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9455P and EPYC 9474F share an identical 48-core/96-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9455P versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9474F — a 7.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 9455P (base: 3.15 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9455P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9474F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9455P scores 116,926 against the EPYC 9474F's 102,255 — a 13.4% lead for the EPYC 9455P. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9455P	EPYC 9474F
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	48 / 96
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+7%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.15 GHz	3.6 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	116,926+14%	102,255
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9455P versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9474F — the EPYC 9455P supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9455P supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9455P) and SP5 (EPYC 9474F).

Feature	EPYC 9455P	EPYC 9474F
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	9 TB+50%	6 TB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9455P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9474F targets Data Center / Performance Optimized. Direct competitor: EPYC 9455P rivals Xeon 6766E; EPYC 9474F rivals Xeon 8461V.

Feature	EPYC 9455P	EPYC 9474F
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Data Center / Performance Optimized

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9455P was priced at $4819, while the EPYC 9474F came in at $6780. On launch pricing ($4819 vs $6780), EPYC 9455P was $1961 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9455P delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9474F — making the EPYC 9455P the 46.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9455P	EPYC 9474F
MSRP	$4819-29%	$6780
Performance per Dollar	24.3+61%	15.1
Release Date	2024	2022

Search EPYC 9455P on Amazon

Search EPYC 9474F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.