
EPYC 9455P
Popular choices:

Xeon 6741P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9455P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+16.2% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,962 vs 3,195).
- ❌9% HIGHER MSRP$4,819 MSRPvs$4,421 MSRP
Xeon 6741P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+62.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $398 less on MSRP ($4,421 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).
- ✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (100,660 vs 116,926).
EPYC 9455P
2024Xeon 6741P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+16.2% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅+62.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $398 less on MSRP ($4,421 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).
- ✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,962 vs 3,195).
- ❌9% HIGHER MSRP$4,819 MSRPvs$4,421 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (100,660 vs 116,926).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9455P better than Xeon 6741P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9455P | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9455P | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 655 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9455P | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 747 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9455P | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 993 FPS | 978 FPS |
| medium | 892 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 767 FPS | 763 FPS |
| ultra | 692 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 799 FPS | 800 FPS |
| medium | 696 FPS | 698 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 525 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 395 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9455P and Xeon 6741P

EPYC 9455P
EPYC 9455P
The EPYC 9455P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 116,926 points. Launch price was $4,819.

Xeon 6741P
Xeon 6741P
The Xeon 6741P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 100,660 points. Launch price was $4,421.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9455P and Xeon 6741P share an identical 48-core/96-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9455P versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6741P — a 14.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9455P (base: 3.15 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9455P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6741P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9455P scores 116,926 against the Xeon 6741P's 100,660 — a 15% lead for the EPYC 9455P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 3,195, a 47.8% lead for the Xeon 6741P that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9455P vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6741P.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 48 / 96 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+16% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.15 GHz+26% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 288 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 116,926+16% | 100,660 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | 3,195+63% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9455P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6741P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9455P supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 76.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9455P) vs 8 (Xeon 6741P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9455P) vs 136 (Xeon 6741P) — the Xeon 6741P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 9 TB+125% | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 136+6% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9455P) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6741P). Primary use case: EPYC 9455P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Xeon 6741P targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9455P rivals Xeon 6766E; Xeon 6741P rivals EPYC 9555.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Data Center |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9455P launched at $4819 MSRP, while the Xeon 6741P debuted at $4421. On MSRP ($4819 vs $4421), the Xeon 6741P is $398 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9455P delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 22.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6741P — making the EPYC 9455P the 6.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4819 | $4421-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.3+7% | 22.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













