EPYC 9534
Xeon Max 9480
EPYC 9534 vs Xeon Max 9480 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9534 vs Xeon Max 9480 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9534 vs Xeon Max 9480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9534
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+127.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 113 MB).
- ✅Costs $4,177 less on MSRP ($8,803 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 58.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.1 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($8,803 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 55,000).
Xeon Max 9480
2023Why buy it
- ✅+254.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9534 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($12,980 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9534 better than Xeon Max 9480?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9534 vs Xeon Max 9480 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9534
The EPYC 9534 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 89,077 points. Launch price was $8,803.
Xeon Max 9480
The Xeon Max 9480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,913 points. Launch price was $12,980.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9534 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Max 9480 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the EPYC 9534 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9534 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Max 9480 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9534 (base: 2.45 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The EPYC 9534 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9534 scores 89,077 against the Xeon Max 9480's 82,913 — a 7.2% lead for the EPYC 9534. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,650 vs 1,900, a 14.1% lead for the Xeon Max 9480 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,500 vs 55,000 (112.1% advantage for the Xeon Max 9480). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9534 vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon Max 9480.
| Feature | EPYC 9534 | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+14% | 56 / 112 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+6% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.45 GHz+29% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+128% | 112.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) |
| PassMark | 89,077+7% | 82,913 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,650 | 1,900+15% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,500 | 55,000+255% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9534 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9534 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9534) vs 8 (Xeon Max 9480). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9534) vs 80 (Xeon Max 9480) — the EPYC 9534 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9534) and C741 (Xeon Max 9480).
| Feature | EPYC 9534 | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+50% | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9534) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Max 9480). Primary use case: EPYC 9534 targets Server, Xeon Max 9480 targets HPC Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9534 rivals Xeon Platinum 8470; Xeon Max 9480 rivals EPYC 9684X.
| Feature | EPYC 9534 | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | HPC Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9534 was priced at $8803, while the Xeon Max 9480 came in at $12980. On launch pricing ($8803 vs $12980), EPYC 9534 was $4177 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9534 delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 6.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Max 9480 — making the EPYC 9534 the 45.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9534 | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8803-32% | $12980 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.1+58% | 6.4 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9534 and Xeon Max 9480
