
EPYC 9565

Xeon 6781P
EPYC 9565 vs Xeon 6781P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9565 vs Xeon 6781P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9565 vs Xeon 6781P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9565
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌17% HIGHER MSRP$10,486 MSRPvs$8,960 MSRP
Xeon 6781P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,526 less on MSRP ($8,960 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
- ✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9565 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (117,946 vs 135,221).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9565 better than Xeon 6781P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9565 vs Xeon 6781P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9565
The EPYC 9565 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,221 points. Launch price was $10,486.

Xeon 6781P
The Xeon 6781P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 80 cores and 160 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 336 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 117,946 points. Launch price was $8,960.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9565 packs 72 cores / 144 threads, while the Xeon 6781P offers 80 cores / 160 threads — the Xeon 6781P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9565 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6781P — a 12.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9565 (base: 3.15 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9565 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6781P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9565 scores 135,221 against the Xeon 6781P's 117,946 — a 13.6% lead for the EPYC 9565. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9565 vs 336 MB (total) on the Xeon 6781P.
| Feature | EPYC 9565 | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 72 / 144 | 80 / 160+11% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+13% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.15 GHz+57% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total)+14% | 336 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 135,221+15% | 117,946 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9565 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6781P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9565 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6781P — the Xeon 6781P supports 6.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9565 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9565) vs 8 (Xeon 6781P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9565) vs 136 (Xeon 6781P) — the Xeon 6781P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 9565 | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6400+7% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+50% | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 136+6% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9565) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6781P). Primary use case: EPYC 9565 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing, Xeon 6781P targets Data Center / Cloud Scale. Direct competitor: EPYC 9565 rivals Xeon 6972P; Xeon 6781P rivals EPYC 9655.
| Feature | EPYC 9565 | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | Data Center / Cloud Computing | Data Center / Cloud Scale |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9565 was priced at $10486, while the Xeon 6781P came in at $8960. On launch pricing ($10486 vs $8960), Xeon 6781P was $1526 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9565 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6781P — making the Xeon 6781P the 2.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9565 | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10486 | $8960-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9 | 13.2+2% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















