EPYC 9745 vs Ryzen 7 5700X

AMD

EPYC 9745

128 Cores256 Thrd400 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 5700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2022
Ryzen family
·······

EPYC 9745 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9745 vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9745 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9745

2024

Why buy it

  • +391.2% higher PassMark.
  • +700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 128 cores / 256 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
  • Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
  • 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($12,141 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • 515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $11,842 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
  • Delivers 726.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 130,698).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9745, which brings 128 cores / 256 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9745 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than EPYC 9745?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 9745 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9745 is the stronger fit. You are getting 391.2% better PassMark, backed by 128 cores and 256 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 5700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 5700X comes in $11,842 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $12,141 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9745 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 391.2% better PassMark. It is also 726.7% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 10.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9745 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 128 cores / 256 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9745 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9745

The EPYC 9745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 130,698 points. Launch price was $12,141.

AMD

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9745 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9745 has 120 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9745 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 9745 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9745 scores 130,698 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 132.3% lead for the EPYC 9745. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9745 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.

FeatureEPYC 9745Ryzen 7 5700X
Cores / Threads
128 / 256+1500%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
4.6 GHz+24%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz+42%
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+700%
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
3 nm-57%
7 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark
130,698+391%
26,609
Cinebench R23 Multi
14,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,116
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,715
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9745 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9745 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the EPYC 9745 supports 87.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9745 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 128 GB 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9745) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9745) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the EPYC 9745 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9745) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).

FeatureEPYC 9745Ryzen 7 5700X
Socket
SP5
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000+88%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB+4700%
128 GB
RAM Channels
12+500%
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+433%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9745) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: EPYC 9745 targets Data Center / High Density, Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9745 rivals Xeon 6980P; Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

FeatureEPYC 9745Ryzen 7 5700X
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V
Target Use
Data Center / High Density
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9745 was priced at $12141, while the Ryzen 7 5700X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($12141 vs $299), Ryzen 7 5700X was $11842 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9745 delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 156.8% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9745Ryzen 7 5700X
MSRP
$12141
$299-98%
Performance per Dollar
10.8
89.0+724%
Release Date
2024
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.