EPYC 9745 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

AMD

EPYC 9745

128 Cores256 Thrd400 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

64 Cores128 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023
Threadripper Pro family
··

EPYC 9745 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9745 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9745 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9745

2024

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (130,698 vs 133,149).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($12,141 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).

    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

    2023

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +34.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Costs $4,792 less on MSRP ($7,349 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
    • Delivers 68.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($7,349 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
    • Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX better than EPYC 9745?
    Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 34.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 34.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX comes in $4,792 cheaper on MSRP at $7,349 MSRP versus $12,141 MSRP, and it still gives you a 34.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 68.3% better value on MSRP (18.1 vs 10.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    EPYC 9745 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

    EPYC 9745 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    EPYC 9745

    The EPYC 9745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 130,698 points. Launch price was $12,141.

    AMD

    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

    The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,149 points. Launch price was $7,349.

    Processing Power

    The EPYC 9745 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9745 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9745 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9745 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9745 scores 130,698 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX's 133,149 — a 1.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureEPYC 9745Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
    Cores / Threads
    128 / 256+100%
    64 / 128
    Boost Clock
    3.7 GHz
    5.1 GHz+38%
    Base Clock
    2.4 GHz
    3.2 GHz+33%
    L3 Cache
    256 MB (total)
    256 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    3 nm-40%
    5 nm
    Architecture
    Turin (2024)
    Storm Peak (2023)
    PassMark
    130,698
    133,149+2%
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    100,000
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,599
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    24,780
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The EPYC 9745 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9745 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — the EPYC 9745 supports 15.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9745 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9745) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9745) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX).

    FeatureEPYC 9745Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
    Socket
    SP5
    sTR5
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-6000+15%
    DDR5-5200
    Max RAM Capacity
    6 TB+200%
    2048 GB
    RAM Channels
    12+50%
    8
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128
    128
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9745) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9745 targets Data Center / High Density, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9745 rivals Xeon 6980P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX rivals Xeon w9-3475X.

    FeatureEPYC 9745Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Virtualization
    AMD-V, SEV-SNP
    true
    Target Use
    Data Center / High Density
    High-end Workstation
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the EPYC 9745 was priced at $12141, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX came in at $7349. On launch pricing ($12141 vs $7349), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX was $4792 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9745 delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 18.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX the 50.9% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 9745Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
    MSRP
    $12141
    $7349-39%
    Performance per Dollar
    10.8
    18.1+68%
    Release Date
    2024
    2023

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.