EPYC 9745 vs EPYC 9845

AMD

EPYC 9745

128 Cores256 Thrd400 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 9845

160 Cores320 Thrd390 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······

EPYC 9745 vs EPYC 9845 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9745 vs EPYC 9845 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9745 vs EPYC 9845: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9745

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,423 less on MSRP ($12,141 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (130,698 vs 152,985).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 320 MB).

EPYC 9845

2024

Why buy it

  • +17.1% higher PassMark.
  • +25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 390W instead of 400W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 11.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $13,564 MSRPvs$12,141 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9845 better than EPYC 9745?
Yes. EPYC 9845 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 17.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9845 is the stronger fit. You are getting 17.1% better PassMark, backed by 160 cores and 320 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9845 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9845 comes in 11.7% more expensive on MSRP at $13,564 MSRP versus $12,141 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 4.8% better value on MSRP (11.3 vs 10.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9845 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 160 cores / 320 threads instead of 128/256. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9745 vs EPYC 9845 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9745

The EPYC 9745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 130,698 points. Launch price was $12,141.

AMD

EPYC 9845

The EPYC 9845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 160 cores and 320 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 390 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 152,985 points. Launch price was $13,564.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9745 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the EPYC 9845 offers 160 cores / 320 threads — the EPYC 9845 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9745 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9845 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 3 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9745 scores 130,698 against the EPYC 9845's 152,985 — a 15.7% lead for the EPYC 9845. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9745 vs 320 MB (total) on the EPYC 9845.

FeatureEPYC 9745EPYC 9845
Cores / Threads
128 / 256
160 / 320+25%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+14%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
320 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm
3 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
130,698
152,985+17%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9745) and SP5 (EPYC 9845).

FeatureEPYC 9745EPYC 9845
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000
DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB
6 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9745 targets Data Center / High Density, EPYC 9845 targets Data Center / AI Training. Direct competitor: EPYC 9745 rivals Xeon 6980P; EPYC 9845 rivals Xeon 6972P.

FeatureEPYC 9745EPYC 9845
Integrated GPU
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Data Center / High Density
Data Center / AI Training
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9745 was priced at $12141, while the EPYC 9845 came in at $13564. On launch pricing ($12141 vs $13564), EPYC 9745 was $1423 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9745 delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 11.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9845 — making the EPYC 9845 the 4.7% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9745EPYC 9845
MSRP
$12141-10%
$13564
Performance per Dollar
10.8
11.3+5%
Release Date
2024
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.