
EPYC 9745 vs Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

EPYC 9745

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9745
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10,588) | ✅ More affordable ($2,442) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+260%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10,588) | ✅ More affordable ($2,442) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9745 and Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

EPYC 9745
The EPYC 9745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 130,698 points. Launch price was $12,141.

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 108,377 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9745 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9745 has 96 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9745 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 9745 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9745 scores 130,698 against the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X's 108,377 — a 18.7% lead for the EPYC 9745. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9745 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X.
| Feature | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 128 / 256+300% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.4 GHz+46% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 130,698+21% | 108,377 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 76,136 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,220 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 29,244 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9745 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9745 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 1 TB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9745) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9745) vs 92 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) — the EPYC 9745 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9745) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X).
| Feature | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+500% | 1 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+39% | 92 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9745) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X). Primary use case: EPYC 9745 targets Data Center / High Density, Ryzen Threadripper 9970X targets HEDT / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9745 rivals Xeon 6980P; Ryzen Threadripper 9970X rivals Xeon w7-3465X.
| Feature | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Data Center / High Density | HEDT / Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9745 launched at $12141 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X debuted at $2499. At current prices ($10588 vs $2442), the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X is $8146 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9745 delivers 12.3 pts/$ vs 44.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X the 113% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $12141 | $2499-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10588 | $2442-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.3 | 44.4+261% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















