FirePro 3D V5700 vs Quadro FX 2700

FirePro 3D V5700

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2700

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro 3D V5700 vs Quadro FX 2700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V5700 vs Quadro FX 2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V5700

2014

Why buy it

  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 499% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 45% higher power demand at 274W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 2700

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $499 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 494.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 189W instead of 274W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro 3D V5700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (547 vs 543), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V5700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 2700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $499 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 494.6% (5.4 vs 0.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 2700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V5700 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V5700 vs Quadro FX 2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V5700

The FirePro 3D V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 547 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2700

The Quadro FX 2700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V5700 scores 547 and the Quadro FX 2700 reaches 543 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V5700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 2700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2700). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700).

FeatureFirePro 3D V5700Quadro FX 2700
G3D Mark Score
547
543
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
2048+753%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+460%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+60%
80
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V5700Quadro FX 2700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V5700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2700 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 2700 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V5700 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2700. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 2700) — the FirePro 3D V5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V5700Quadro FX 2700
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V5700 draws 274W versus the Quadro FX 2700's 189W — a 36.7% difference. The Quadro FX 2700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro 3D V5700Quadro FX 2700
TDP
274W
189W-31%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
Height
112mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
2.0
2.9+45%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V5700 came in at $599, while the Quadro FX 2700 launched at $100. On MSRP, Quadro FX 2700 was 83.3% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 5.4 (Quadro FX 2700) — the Quadro FX 2700 offers 500% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 3D V5700 (2014 vs 2008).

FeatureFirePro 3D V5700Quadro FX 2700
MSRP
$599
$100-83%
Performance per Dollar
0.9
5.4+500%
Codename
Tahiti
GT200B
Release
January 18 2014
November 11 2008
Ranking
#423
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.