FirePro 3D V5700 vs Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU

FirePro 3D V5700

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU

2018
Similar parts
·······

FirePro 3D V5700 vs Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V5700 vs Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V5700

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro 3D V5700 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 3814.3% higher power demand at 274W vs 7W.

Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 7W instead of 274W, a 267W reduction.
  • More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro 3D V5700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (547 vs 540), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V5700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V5700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro 3D V5700 vs Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V5700

The FirePro 3D V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 547 points.

Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 540 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V5700 scores 547 and the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU reaches 540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V5700Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU
G3D Mark Score
547+1%
540
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V5700Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V5700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU carries 0 MB. FirePro 3D V5700 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V5700 and System on the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU.

FeatureFirePro 3D V5700Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V5700 draws 274W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU's 7W — a 190% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureFirePro 3D V5700Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU
TDP
274W
7W-97%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
170mm
Height
112mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
2.0
77.1+3755%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V5700 came in at $599, while the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU launched at $0. On MSRP, Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU) — the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU (2018 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro 3D V5700Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU
MSRP
$599
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.9
Infinity
Codename
Tahiti
Release
January 18 2014
December 6 2018
Ranking
#423
#916

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.