
FirePro 3D V5700

Radeon R5 M255
FirePro 3D V5700 vs Radeon R5 M255 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V5700 vs Radeon R5 M255 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 3D V5700 vs Radeon R5 M255: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V5700
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌299.3% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌265.3% higher power demand at 274W vs 75W.
Radeon R5 M255
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $449 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 296.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 274W, a 199W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V5700 vs Radeon R5 M255 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V5700
The FirePro 3D V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 547 points.

Radeon R5 M255
The Radeon R5 M255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $799.99.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V5700 scores 547 and the Radeon R5 M255 reaches 543 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V5700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 M255 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 640 (Radeon R5 M255). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M255).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 547 | 543 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+194% | 1.184 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+220% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V5700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M255 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M255 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V5700 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M255. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 M255) — the FirePro 3D V5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M255). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12+19% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.3+30% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R5 M255). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R5 M255).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V5700 draws 274W versus the Radeon R5 M255's 75W — a 114% difference. The Radeon R5 M255 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M255). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 75W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 7.2+260% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V5700 came in at $599, while the Radeon R5 M255 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon R5 M255 was 75% cheaper ($449 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 3.6 (Radeon R5 M255) — the Radeon R5 M255 offers 300% better value.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $150-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 3.6+300% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Venus |
| Release | January 18 2014 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #423 | #851 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














