FirePro M5950 vs FirePro M40003 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M5950 vs FirePro M40003 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M5950 vs FirePro M40003: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M5950
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌33.3% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
FirePro M40003
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M5950 vs FirePro M40003 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M5950
The FirePro M5950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,314 points.

FirePro M40003
The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M5950 scores 1,314 and the FirePro M40003 reaches 1,364 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M5950 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro M40003 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (FirePro M5950) vs 512 (FirePro M40003). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (FirePro M5950) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003).
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,314 | 1,364+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 512+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.696 TFLOPS | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 128 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M5950 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro M40003 carries 4 GB. FirePro M40003 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M5950 and 64-bit on the FirePro M40003.
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro M5950) vs 12 (FirePro M40003). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 6.
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 5 | 6+20% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro M5950) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M40003). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M5950) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M40003).
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M5950 draws 35W versus the FirePro M40003's 33W — a 5.9% difference. The FirePro M40003 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M5950) vs 350W (FirePro M40003). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 82mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 33W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 82mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 37.5 | 41.3+10% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M5950 came in at $200, while the FirePro M40003 launched at $150. On MSRP, FirePro M40003 was 25% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (FirePro M5950) vs 9.1 (FirePro M40003) — the FirePro M40003 offers 37.9% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M40003 (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $150-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.6 | 9.1+38% |
| Codename | Whistler | Chelsea |
| Release | January 4 2011 | June 27 2012 |
| Ranking | #795 | #752 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















