
FirePro M5950 vs FirePro M40003

FirePro M5950
Popular choices:

FirePro M40003
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M5950 is positioned at rank 181 and the FirePro M40003 is on rank 151, so the FirePro M40003 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M5950
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M40003
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M40003 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M5950.
| Insight | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M40003 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M40003 holds the technical lead. Priced at $72 (vs $200), it costs 64% less, resulting in a 188.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+188.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($72) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M5950 and FirePro M40003

FirePro M5950
The FirePro M5950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,314 points.

FirePro M40003
The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M5950 scores 1,314 and the FirePro M40003 reaches 1,364 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M5950 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro M40003 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (FirePro M5950) vs 512 (FirePro M40003). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (FirePro M5950) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003).
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,314 | 1,364+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 512+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.696 TFLOPS | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 128 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M5950 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro M40003 has 4 GB. The FirePro M40003 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro M5950) vs 12 (FirePro M40003). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 6.
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 5 | 6+20% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro M5950) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M40003). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M5950) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M40003).
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M5950 draws 35W versus the FirePro M40003's 33W — a 5.9% difference. The FirePro M40003 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M5950) vs 350W (FirePro M40003). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 82mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 33W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 82mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 37.5 | 41.3+10% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M5950 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the FirePro M40003 launched at $150 and now averages $72. The FirePro M40003 costs 64% less ($128 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.6 (FirePro M5950) vs 18.9 (FirePro M40003) — the FirePro M40003 offers 186.4% better value. The FirePro M40003 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $150-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $72-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.6 | 18.9+186% |
| Codename | Whistler | Chelsea |
| Release | January 4 2011 | June 27 2012 |
| Ranking | #795 | #752 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















