
FirePro M5950

FireStream 9270
FirePro M5950 vs FireStream 9270 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M5950 vs FireStream 9270 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M5950 vs FireStream 9270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M5950
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,299 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 634.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
FireStream 9270
2008Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌649.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M5950 vs FireStream 9270 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M5950
The FirePro M5950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,314 points.

FireStream 9270
The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M5950 scores 1,314 and the FireStream 9270 reaches 1,341 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M5950 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FireStream 9270 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (FirePro M5950) vs 800 (FireStream 9270). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (FirePro M5950) vs 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270).
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,314 | 1,341+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 800+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.696 TFLOPS | 1.2 TFLOPS+72% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 160 KB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M5950 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the FireStream 9270 carries 2 GB. FireStream 9270 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M5950 and 64-bit on the FireStream 9270.
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro M5950) vs 10.1 (FireStream 9270). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+11% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1+24% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 5+400% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro M5950) vs None (FireStream 9270). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M5950) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9270).
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M5950 draws 35W versus the FireStream 9270's 160W — a 128.2% difference. The FirePro M5950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M5950) vs 350W (FireStream 9270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-78% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 37.5+346% | 8.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M5950 came in at $200, while the FireStream 9270 launched at $1499. On MSRP, FirePro M5950 was 86.7% cheaper ($1299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (FirePro M5950) vs 0.9 (FireStream 9270) — the FirePro M5950 offers 633.3% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M5950 (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro M5950 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-87% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.6+633% | 0.9 |
| Codename | Whistler | RV770 |
| Release | January 4 2011 | November 13 2008 |
| Ranking | #795 | #790 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















