
FirePro V5700

GeForce 9600 GT
FirePro V5700 vs GeForce 9600 GT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V5700 vs GeForce 9600 GT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V5700 vs GeForce 9600 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V5700
2011Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌302% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce 9600 GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 308.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V5700 vs GeForce 9600 GT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V5700
The FirePro V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 465 points.

GeForce 9600 GT
The GeForce 9600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5700 scores 465 and the GeForce 9600 GT reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce 9600 GT uses G9x, both on 40 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V5700) vs 224 (GeForce 9600 GT).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 465 | 473+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | G9x |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+471% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9600 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro V5700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5700 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9600 GT carries 1 GB. FirePro V5700 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V5700 and 64-bit on the GeForce 9600 GT.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro V5700) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9600 GT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.1 (10_0)+10% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V5700) vs PureVideo HD (GeForce 9600 GT). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro V5700) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9600 GT).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5700 draws 150W versus the GeForce 9600 GT's 150W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 9600 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5700) vs 350W (GeForce 9600 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1 | 3.2+3% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V5700 came in at $599, while the GeForce 9600 GT launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce 9600 GT was 75.1% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro V5700) vs 3.2 (GeForce 9600 GT) — the GeForce 9600 GT offers 300% better value. The newer card here is FirePro V5700 (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $149-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 3.2+300% |
| Codename | Cayman | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | May 24 2011 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #656 | #825 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














