FirePro V5700 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4670
FirePro V5700
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro V5700 is positioned at rank 368 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is on rank 418, so the FirePro V5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5700
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 4670.
| Insight | FirePro V5700 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro V5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V5700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $20), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V5700 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V5700 and Mobility Radeon HD 4670
FirePro V5700
The FirePro V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 465 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 463 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5700 scores 465 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 reaches 463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V5700) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V5700) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 465 | 463 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+60% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+111% | 0.88 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5700 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 has 1 GB. The FirePro V5700 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V5700) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) — the FirePro V5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro V5700) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V5700) vs None (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro V5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5700 draws 150W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4670's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5700) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1 | 15.4+397% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V5700 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.3 (FirePro V5700) vs 23.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) — the FirePro V5700 offers 0.9% better value. The FirePro V5700 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2009).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $67-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.3 | 23.1 |
| Codename | Cayman | M98 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #656 | #927 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V5700 and Mobility Radeon HD 4670
