FirePro V5700 vs GeForce GT 525M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V5700 vs GeForce GT 525M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V5700 vs GeForce GT 525M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V5700
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
GeForce GT 525M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V5700 vs GeForce GT 525M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V5700
The FirePro V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 465 points.

GeForce GT 525M
The GeForce GT 525M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 451 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5700 scores 465 and the GeForce GT 525M reaches 451 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GT 525M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V5700) vs 384 (GeForce GT 525M). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V5700) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 525M).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce GT 525M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 465+3% | 451 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+233% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+147% | 0.7526 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+900% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 525M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro V5700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce GT 525M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5700 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 525M carries 1 GB. FirePro V5700 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V5700 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 525M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V5700) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 525M) — the FirePro V5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce GT 525M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro V5700) vs 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 525M). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce GT 525M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 (FL11_0)+19% |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.2+27% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V5700) vs VP4 (GeForce GT 525M). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro V5700) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 525M).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce GT 525M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VP4 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5700 draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 525M's 50W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GT 525M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5700) vs 350W (GeForce GT 525M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce GT 525M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1 | 9.0+190% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GT 525M (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | GeForce GT 525M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | Cayman | GK107 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | June 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #656 | #726 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















