FirePro V5700 vs Radeon HD 7560D
FirePro V5700
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7560D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro V5700 is positioned at rank 368 and the Radeon HD 7560D is on rank 244, so the Radeon HD 7560D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5700
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7560D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7560D.
| Insight | FirePro V5700 | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7560D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7560D holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 29.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V5700 | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+29.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V5700 and Radeon HD 7560D
FirePro V5700
The FirePro V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 465 points.
Radeon HD 7560D
The Radeon HD 7560D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 452 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5700 scores 465 and the Radeon HD 7560D reaches 452 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 7560D uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V5700) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7560D). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V5700) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7560D).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 465+3% | 452 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1792+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+54% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 448 KB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5700 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7560D has 512 MB. The FirePro V5700 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V5700) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7560D) — the Radeon HD 7560D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro V5700) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7560D). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2 (11_0)+11% |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V5700) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7560D). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro V5700) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon HD 7560D).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5700 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7560D's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The FirePro V5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5700) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7560D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1+35% | 2.3 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V5700 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 7560D launched at $101 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 7560D costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.3 (FirePro V5700) vs 30.1 (Radeon HD 7560D) — the Radeon HD 7560D offers 29.2% better value. The Radeon HD 7560D is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $101-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.3 | 30.1+29% |
| Codename | Cayman | Tahiti |
| Release | May 24 2011 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #656 | #454 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V5700 and Radeon HD 7560D
