CPU
GPU
FireStream 9170
Popular choices:
GeForce 9800 S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FireStream 9170 is positioned at rank 393 and the GeForce 9800 S is on rank 510, so the FireStream 9170 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9170
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800 S
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FireStream 9170 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9800 S.
| Insight | FireStream 9170 | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FireStream 9170 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FireStream 9170 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 103.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FireStream 9170 | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+103.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FireStream 9170 and GeForce 9800 S
FireStream 9170
The FireStream 9170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 647 points.
GeForce 9800 S
The GeForce 9800 S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 636 points.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9170 scores 647 and the GeForce 9800 S reaches 636 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9170 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 9800 S uses G9x, both on 40 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9170) vs 224 (GeForce 9800 S).
| Feature | FireStream 9170 | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 647+2% | 636 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | G9x |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600+614% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9170 | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FireStream 9170 | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9170) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9800 S). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FireStream 9170 | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.1 (10_0)+10% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9170) vs No NVENC (Tesla) (GeForce 9800 S). Decoder: UVD+ vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9170) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9800 S).
| Feature | FireStream 9170 | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No NVENC (Tesla) |
| Decoder | UVD+ | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9170 draws 225W versus the GeForce 9800 S's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce 9800 S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9170) vs 350W (GeForce 9800 S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FireStream 9170 | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.9 | 4.2+45% |
Value Analysis
The FireStream 9170 launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 9800 S launched at $150 and now averages $40. The FireStream 9170 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.4 (FireStream 9170) vs 15.9 (GeForce 9800 S) — the FireStream 9170 offers 103.8% better value. The FireStream 9170 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9170 | GeForce 9800 S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $150-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-50% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.4+104% | 15.9 |
| Codename | Cypress | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | June 23 2010 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #631 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9170 and GeForce 9800 S
