FireStream 9170 vs Radeon R7 M340

FireStream 9170

2010Core: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M340

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 915 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FireStream 9170 vs Radeon R7 M340 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9170 vs Radeon R7 M340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9170

2010

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1565.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$120 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon R7 M340

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,879 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1563.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FireStream 9170 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (647 vs 646), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FireStream 9170 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,879 cheaper on MSRP at $120 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1563.3% (5.4 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M340 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FireStream 9170 has the stronger long-term case.

FireStream 9170 vs Radeon R7 M340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FireStream 9170

The FireStream 9170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 647 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M340

The Radeon R7 M340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 646 points.

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9170 scores 647 and the Radeon R7 M340 reaches 646 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9170 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M340 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9170) vs 640 (Radeon R7 M340). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9170) vs 1.171 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M340).

FeatureFireStream 9170Radeon R7 M340
G3D Mark Score
647
646
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1600+150%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.64 TFLOPS+125%
1.171 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+100%
40
L1 Cache
160 KB
160 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFireStream 9170Radeon R7 M340
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9170 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M340. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FireStream 9170) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M340) — the FireStream 9170 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFireStream 9170Radeon R7 M340
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9170 draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 M340's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R7 M340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9170) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M340). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureFireStream 9170Radeon R7 M340
TDP
225W
75W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
2.9
8.6+197%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FireStream 9170 came in at $1999, while the Radeon R7 M340 launched at $120. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M340 was 94% cheaper ($1879 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (FireStream 9170) vs 5.4 (Radeon R7 M340) — the Radeon R7 M340 offers 1700% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M340 (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureFireStream 9170Radeon R7 M340
MSRP
$1999
$120-94%
Performance per Dollar
0.3
5.4+1700%
Codename
Cypress
Tropo
Release
June 23 2010
May 5 2015
Ranking
#631
#737

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.