FireStream 9170 vs Quadro K510M

FireStream 9170

2010Core: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K510M

2013Core: 771 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FireStream 9170 vs Quadro K510M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9170 vs Quadro K510M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9170

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Quadro K510M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FireStream 9170 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (647 vs 641), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FireStream 9170 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9170 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FireStream 9170 vs Quadro K510M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FireStream 9170

The FireStream 9170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 647 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K510M

The Quadro K510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 641 points.

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9170 scores 647 and the Quadro K510M reaches 641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9170 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro K510M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9170) vs 1,536 (Quadro K510M). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9170) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K510M).

FeatureFireStream 9170Quadro K510M
G3D Mark Score
647
641
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1600+4%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.64 TFLOPS+11%
2.369 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
128+60%
L1 Cache
160 KB+25%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFireStream 9170Quadro K510M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FireStream 9170 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K510M carries 1 GB. Quadro K510M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9170 and 64-bit on the Quadro K510M.

FeatureFireStream 9170Quadro K510M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9170 draws 225W versus the Quadro K510M's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro K510M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9170) vs 350W (Quadro K510M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFireStream 9170Quadro K510M
TDP
225W
100W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
2.9
6.4+121%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K510M (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureFireStream 9170Quadro K510M
MSRP
$1999
Codename
Cypress
GK104
Release
June 23 2010
July 23 2013
Ranking
#631
#562

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.