FireStream 9170
Radeon HD 7610M
FireStream 9170 vs Radeon HD 7610M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9170 vs Radeon HD 7610M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FireStream 9170 vs Radeon HD 7610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9170
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1025% higher power demand at 225W vs 20W.
Radeon HD 7610M
2011Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 225W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9170 vs Radeon HD 7610M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FireStream 9170
The FireStream 9170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 647 points.
Radeon HD 7610M
The Radeon HD 7610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 25 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 632 points.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9170 scores 647 and the Radeon HD 7610M reaches 632 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9170 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 7610M uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9170) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7610M). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9170) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7610M).
| Feature | FireStream 9170 | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 647+2% | 632 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600+233% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.64 TFLOPS+279% | 0.696 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+233% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9170 | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9170 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7610M carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 7610M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9170 and System on the Radeon HD 7610M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FireStream 9170) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7610M) — the FireStream 9170 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9170 | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9170 draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 7610M's 20W — a 167.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9170) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FireStream 9170 | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 20W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.9 | 31.6+990% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon HD 7610M (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | FireStream 9170 | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | — |
| Codename | Cypress | Thames |
| Release | June 23 2010 | December 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #631 | #928 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9170 and Radeon HD 7610M
