CPU
GPU
FX-4300
Athlon X4 760K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-4300 is positioned at rank 696 and the Athlon X4 760K is on rank 599, so the Athlon X4 760K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-4300
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 760K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-4300 | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-4300 | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+24%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-4300 and Athlon X4 760K
FX-4300
The FX-4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,995 points. Launch price was $122.
Athlon X4 760K
The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the FX-4300 and Athlon X4 760K share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-4300 versus 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 760K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The FX-4300 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X4 760K uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4300 scores 2,995 against the Athlon X4 760K's 2,982 — a 0.4% lead for the FX-4300.
| Feature | FX-4300 | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB | 4 MB |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Richland (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 2,995 | 2,982 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 495 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,404 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-4300 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X4 760K uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-4300 | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-4300) / AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K). Primary use case: Athlon X4 760K targets Budget.
| Feature | FX-4300 | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The FX-4300 launched at $122 MSRP, while the Athlon X4 760K debuted at $100. At current prices ($25 vs $20), the Athlon X4 760K is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-4300 delivers 119.8 pts/$ vs 149.1 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 760K — making the Athlon X4 760K the 21.8% better value option.
| Feature | FX-4300 | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $122 | $100-18% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $20-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 119.8 | 149.1+24% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on FX-4300 and Athlon X4 760K
