FX-4350 vs Xeon Gold 6262V

FX-4350 vs Xeon Gold 6262V Performance Spectrum

FX-4350

4 / 4

3,184

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon Gold 6262V

24 / 48

3,155

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-4350 vs Xeon Gold 6262V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-4350 vs Xeon Gold 6262V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-4350

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 125W instead of 135W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6262V.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6262V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6262V, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6262V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 6262V

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,155 vs 3,184).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-4350.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-4350 better than Xeon Gold 6262V?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6262V makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-4350 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-4350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-4350 is the better buy right now. FX-4350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $122 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6262V is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (26.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6262V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-4350 vs Xeon Gold 6262V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-4350

The FX-4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,184 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon Gold 6262V

The Xeon Gold 6262V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,155 points. Launch price was $2,900.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-4350 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6262V offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6262V has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the FX-4350 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6262V — a 17.7% clock advantage for the FX-4350 (base: 4.2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The FX-4350 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6262V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4350 scores 3,184 against the Xeon Gold 6262V's 3,155 — a 0.9% lead for the FX-4350.

Feature	FX-4350	Xeon Gold 6262V
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	24 / 48+500%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+19%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+121%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	33 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB	24 MB+500%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	3,184	3,155
Geekbench 6 Single	504	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,289	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-4350 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon Gold 6262V uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.