Core i3-10110Y vs FX-4350

Core i3-10110Y vs FX-4350 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-10110Y

2 / 4

3,171

0.0%

Pentium Dual Core T2390

3,184

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10110Y vs FX-4350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10110Y vs FX-4350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10110Y

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-4350 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,171 vs 3,184).
❌309.6% higher power demand at 512W vs 125W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-4350.

FX-4350

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 125W instead of 512W, a 387W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-10110Y.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Core i3-10110Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-4350 better than Core i3-10110Y?

Yes. FX-4350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-4350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.2% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-4350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-4350 is the better buy right now. FX-4350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $122 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (26.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible UTFCBGA1377 setup, Core i3-10110Y can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10110Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10110Y vs FX-4350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10110Y

The Core i3-10110Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,171 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-4350

The FX-4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,184 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10110Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4350 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i3-10110Y versus 4.3 GHz on the FX-4350 — a 7.2% clock advantage for the FX-4350 (base: 1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i3-10110Y uses the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-4350 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10110Y scores 3,171 against the FX-4350's 3,184 — a 0.4% lead for the FX-4350.

Feature	Core i3-10110Y	FX-4350
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.3 GHz+7%
Base Clock	1 GHz	4.2 GHz+320%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	4096 kB+1500%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-Y (2019)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	3,171	3,184
Geekbench 6 Single	—	504
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,289

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10110Y uses the UTFCBGA1377 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10110Y	FX-4350
Socket	UTFCBGA1377	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16