Core i3-10110Y vs Core i5-6260U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10110Y vs Core i5-6260U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10110Y vs Core i5-6260U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10110Y

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,171 vs 3,200).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6260U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-6260U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Graphics 540, while Core i3-10110Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10110Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-6260U better than Core i3-10110Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-10110Y is ahead with a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6260U pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6260U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-6260U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-6260U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10110Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10110Y vs Core i5-6260U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10110Y

The Core i3-10110Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,171 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-6260U

The Core i5-6260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,200 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10110Y and Core i5-6260U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i3-10110Y versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-6260U — a 31.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-10110Y (base: 1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i3-10110Y uses the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-6260U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10110Y scores 3,171 against the Core i5-6260U's 3,200 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-6260U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-10110Y vs 4 MB on the Core i5-6260U.

Feature	Core i3-10110Y	Core i5-6260U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+38%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	1.8 GHz+80%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-Y (2019)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,171	3,200
Geekbench 6 Single	—	979

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10110Y uses the UTFCBGA1377 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6260U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10110Y	Core i5-6260U
Socket	UTFCBGA1377	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-10110Y) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6260U). The Core i5-6260U includes integrated graphics (Iris Graphics 540), while the Core i3-10110Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6260U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-6260U rivals A12-9720P.