
FX-6130 vs Athlon PRO 300GE

FX-6130

Athlon PRO 300GE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Athlon PRO 300GE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-6130 | Athlon PRO 300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-6130 | Athlon PRO 300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+25%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-6130 and Athlon PRO 300GE

FX-6130
The FX-6130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,353 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon PRO 300GE
The Athlon PRO 300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 4,342 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The FX-6130 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Athlon PRO 300GE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6130 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the FX-6130 versus 3.4 GHz on the Athlon PRO 300GE — a 13.7% clock advantage for the FX-6130. The FX-6130 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon PRO 300GE uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6130 scores 4,353 against the Athlon PRO 300GE's 4,342 — a 0.3% lead for the FX-6130. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6130 vs 4 MB on the Athlon PRO 300GE.
| Feature | FX-6130 | Athlon PRO 300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+200% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+15% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
| Process | 32 nm | 12 nm-63% |
| Architecture | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 4,353 | 4,342 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-6130 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon PRO 300GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-6130 | Athlon PRO 300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-6130) / AMD-V (Athlon PRO 300GE). The Athlon PRO 300GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the FX-6130 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon PRO 300GE targets Desktop.
| Feature | FX-6130 | Athlon PRO 300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The FX-6130 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Athlon PRO 300GE debuted at $50. At current prices ($40 vs $50), the FX-6130 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-6130 delivers 108.8 pts/$ vs 86.8 pts/$ for the Athlon PRO 300GE — making the FX-6130 the 22.5% better value option.
| Feature | FX-6130 | Athlon PRO 300GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-20% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.8+25% | 86.8 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















