FX-6130 vs Pentium Gold G6505

AMD

FX-6130

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium Gold G6505

2 Cores4 Thrd58 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

FX-6130 vs Pentium Gold G6505 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-6130 vs Pentium Gold G6505 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-6130 vs Pentium Gold G6505: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-6130

2012

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (4,353 vs 4,371).
  • 63.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 58W.

Pentium Gold G6505

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 58W instead of 95W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Gold G6505 better than FX-6130?
Yes. Pentium Gold G6505 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Pentium Gold G6505 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Gold G6505 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium Gold G6505 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium Gold G6505 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium Gold G6505 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-6130 vs Pentium Gold G6505 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FX-6130

The FX-6130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,353 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium Gold G6505

The Pentium Gold G6505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 4,371 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

The FX-6130 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Pentium Gold G6505 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6130 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the FX-6130 versus 4.2 GHz on the Pentium Gold G6505 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Pentium Gold G6505 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The FX-6130 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Gold G6505 uses Comet Lake-R (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6130 scores 4,353 against the Pentium Gold G6505's 4,371 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium Gold G6505. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6130 vs 4 MB (total) on the Pentium Gold G6505.

FeatureFX-6130Pentium Gold G6505
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+200%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz+8%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6 MB+2300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Zambezi (2011−2012)
Comet Lake-R (2021)
PassMark
4,353
4,371
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6130 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Gold G6505 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-6130Pentium Gold G6505
Socket
AM3+
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%