FX-6130 vs Xeon Bronze 3104

FX-6130 vs Xeon Bronze 3104 Performance Spectrum

FX-6130

6 / 6

4,353

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon Bronze 3104

6 / 6

4,383

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-6130 vs Xeon Bronze 3104 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-6130 vs Xeon Bronze 3104: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-6130

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,353 vs 4,383).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Bronze 3104, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Bronze 3104

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅Draws 85W instead of 95W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Bronze 3104 better than FX-6130?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Bronze 3104 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-6130 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Bronze 3104 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Bronze 3104 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Bronze 3104 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Bronze 3104 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012), more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 6/6, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-6130 vs Xeon Bronze 3104 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-6130

The FX-6130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,353 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon Bronze 3104

The Xeon Bronze 3104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $213.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the FX-6130 and Xeon Bronze 3104 share an identical 6-core/6-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the FX-6130 versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3104 — a 78.6% clock advantage for the FX-6130 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The FX-6130 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6130 scores 4,353 against the Xeon Bronze 3104's 4,383 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Bronze 3104. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6130 vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3104.

Feature	FX-6130	Xeon Bronze 3104
Cores / Threads	6 / 6	6 / 6
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+129%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+112%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8.25 MB+3%
L2 Cache	6 MB	6 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Zambezi (2011−2012)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	4,353	4,383

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6130 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.