FX-6300
VS
Core i3-7300T

FX-6300 vs Core i3-7300T

AMD

FX-6300

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-7300T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-6300 is positioned at rank 579 and the Core i3-7300T is on rank 593, so the FX-6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9946%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9398%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6824%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2056%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1628%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1425%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
816%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
805%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
733%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
733%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
725%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
705%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
696%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
693%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
686%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
98%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
97%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
100%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
99%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
99%
#584
Pentium G4520
MSRP: $86|Avg: $45
99%
#585
Core i3-4170
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
99%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
99%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
99%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
97%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
97%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
97%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
96%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7300T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10377%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9805%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7119%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2145%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1699%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1486%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
851%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
840%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
765%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
765%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
756%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
736%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
726%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
723%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
716%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
100%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
100%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
100%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
99%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
99%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
98%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
98%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
98%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
98%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7300T (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightFX-6300Core i3-7300T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($35)
⚠️ Higher cost ($128)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6300 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightFX-6300Core i3-7300T
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+265%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($35)
⚠️ Higher cost ($128)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-6300 and Core i3-7300T

AMD

FX-6300

The FX-6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,137 points. Launch price was $132.

Intel

Core i3-7300T

The Core i3-7300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,145 points. Launch price was $147.

Processing Power

The FX-6300 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i3-7300T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6300 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the FX-6300 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-7300T — a 8.2% clock advantage for the FX-6300 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The FX-6300 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-7300T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6300 scores 4,137 against the Core i3-7300T's 4,145 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-7300T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 534 vs 1,100, a 69.3% lead for the Core i3-7300T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-6300 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7300T.

FeatureFX-6300Core i3-7300T
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+200%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+9%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6144 kB+2300%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,137
4,145
Geekbench 6 Single
534
1,100+106%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6300 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-7300T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the FX-6300 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7300T — the Core i3-7300T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7300T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (FX-6300) vs 16 (Core i3-7300T) — the Core i3-7300T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 990FX,AMD 970 (FX-6300) and B250,H270,Z270,Q250,Q270 (Core i3-7300T).

FeatureFX-6300Core i3-7300T
Socket
AM3+
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-6300 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (FX-6300) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7300T). The Core i3-7300T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the FX-6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7300T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7300T rivals Ryzen 3 2200GE.

FeatureFX-6300Core i3-7300T
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-6300 launched at $132 MSRP, while the Core i3-7300T debuted at $138. At current prices ($35 vs $128), the FX-6300 is $93 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-6300 delivers 118.2 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the Core i3-7300T — making the FX-6300 the 114% better value option.

FeatureFX-6300Core i3-7300T
MSRP
$132-4%
$138
Avg Price (30d)
$35-73%
$128
Performance per Dollar
118.2+265%
32.4
Release Date
2012
2017