FX-6300
VS
Core i3-8140U

FX-6300 vs Core i3-8140U

AMD

FX-6300

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-8140U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-6300 is positioned at rank 579 and the Core i3-8140U is on rank 530, so the Core i3-8140U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9946%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9398%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6824%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2056%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1628%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1425%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
816%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
805%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
733%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
733%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
725%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
705%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
696%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
693%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
686%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
98%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
97%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
100%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
99%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
99%
#584
Pentium G4520
MSRP: $86|Avg: $45
99%
#585
Core i3-4170
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
99%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
99%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
99%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
97%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
97%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
97%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
96%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-8140U

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
100%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
98%
#518
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
694%
#519
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
684%
#520
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
628%
#521
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
625%
#522
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
619%
#524
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
598%
#525
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
573%
#526
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
573%
#527
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
557%
#530
Core i3-8140U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-8140U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightFX-6300Core i3-8140U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6300 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightFX-6300Core i3-8140U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-6300 and Core i3-8140U

AMD

FX-6300

The FX-6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,137 points. Launch price was $132.

Intel

Core i3-8140U

The Core i3-8140U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2019 (6 years ago). It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,227 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The FX-6300 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i3-8140U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6300 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the FX-6300 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-8140U — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-8140U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The FX-6300 is built on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the FX-6300 scores 4,137 against the Core i3-8140U's 4,227 — a 2.2% lead for the Core i3-8140U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 534 vs 1,225, a 78.6% lead for the Core i3-8140U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-6300 vs 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-8140U.

FeatureFX-6300Core i3-8140U
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+200%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz+3%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+67%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB+100%
4 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
6144 kB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark
4,137
4,227+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
534
1,225+129%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6300 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-8140U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the FX-6300 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-8140U — the Core i3-8140U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-8140U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (FX-6300) vs 16 (Core i3-8140U) — the Core i3-8140U offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureFX-6300Core i3-8140U
Socket
AM3+
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-6300 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (FX-6300) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-8140U). The Core i3-8140U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 620), while the FX-6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8140U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-8140U rivals Ryzen 3 3300U.

FeatureFX-6300Core i3-8140U
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 620
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop