FX-6300
VS
Xeon E5-1607 v2

FX-6300 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2

AMD

FX-6300

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-1607 v2

4 Cores4 Thrd130 WWMax: 3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-6300 is positioned at rank 579 and the Xeon E5-1607 v2 is on rank 676, so the FX-6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9946%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9398%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6824%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2056%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1628%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1425%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
816%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
805%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
733%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
733%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
725%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
705%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
696%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
693%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
686%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
98%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
97%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
100%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
99%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
99%
#584
Pentium G4520
MSRP: $86|Avg: $45
99%
#585
Core i3-4170
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
99%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
99%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
99%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
97%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
97%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
97%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
96%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1607 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12550%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2370%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2105%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1626%
#398
Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6000
100%
#399
Xeon W-3365
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
99%
#400
EPYC 7713P
MSRP: $5010|Avg: $2443
98%
#401
Xeon W-2145
MSRP: $1113|Avg: $145
98%
#402
EPYC 9475F
MSRP: $7592|Avg: $7592
97%
#403
Xeon Gold 6554S
MSRP: $3157|Avg: $2836
97%
#676
Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $68
100%
#678
Xeon W5590
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
100%
#683
Xeon E5-1603 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $40
99%
#684
Xeon E3-1270
MSRP: $330|Avg: $178
98%
#691
Xeon E5-1650 v2
MSRP: $583|Avg: $60
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($68) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-1607 v2 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightFX-6300Xeon E5-1607 v2
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($35)
⚠️ Higher cost ($68)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-E (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6300 ($35), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($33 less, 49% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightFX-6300Xeon E5-1607 v2
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+94%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($35)
⚠️ Higher cost ($68)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-6300 and Xeon E5-1607 v2

AMD

FX-6300

The FX-6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,137 points. Launch price was $132.

Intel

Xeon E5-1607 v2

The Xeon E5-1607 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The FX-6300 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the FX-6300 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v2 — a 23.5% clock advantage for the FX-6300 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The FX-6300 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6300 scores 4,137 against the Xeon E5-1607 v2's 4,141 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-1607 v2. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-6300 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1607 v2.

FeatureFX-6300Xeon E5-1607 v2
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+50%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+27%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+17%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB
10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
6144 kB+2300%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark
4,137
4,141
Geekbench 6 Single
534
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6300 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-6300Xeon E5-1607 v2
Socket
AM3+
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (FX-6300) / not specified (Xeon E5-1607 v2).

FeatureFX-6300Xeon E5-1607 v2
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-6300 launched at $132 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 debuted at $250. At current prices ($35 vs $68), the FX-6300 is $33 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-6300 delivers 118.2 pts/$ vs 60.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1607 v2 — making the FX-6300 the 64% better value option.

FeatureFX-6300Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP
$132-47%
$250
Avg Price (30d)
$35-49%
$68
Performance per Dollar
118.2+94%
60.9
Release Date
2012
2013