Core i5-10210Y vs FX-6300
Core i5-10210Y
FX-6300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-10210Y is positioned at rank 429 and the FX-6300 is on rank 579, so the Core i5-10210Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10210Y
Performance Per Dollar FX-6300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-10210Y | FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($35) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake-Y (2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-10210Y | FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($35) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10210Y and FX-6300
Core i5-10210Y
The Core i5-10210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,131 points. Launch price was $69.
FX-6300
The FX-6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,137 points. Launch price was $132.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10210Y packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-6300 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i5-10210Y versus 3.8 GHz on the FX-6300 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-10210Y (base: 1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-10210Y uses the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6300 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10210Y scores 4,131 against the FX-6300's 4,137 — a 0.1% lead for the FX-6300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,079 vs 534, a 67.6% lead for the Core i5-10210Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10210Y vs 8192 kB on the FX-6300.
| Feature | Core i5-10210Y | FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+5% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 3.5 GHz+250% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8192 kB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 6144 kB+2300% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-Y (2019) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 4,131 | 4,137 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,079+102% | 534 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,380 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10210Y uses the UTFCBGA1377 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6300 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3 2133 MHz on the Core i5-10210Y versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-6300 — the Core i5-10210Y supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The FX-6300 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core i5-10210Y) vs 0 (FX-6300) — the Core i5-10210Y offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i5-10210Y) and AMD 990FX,AMD 970 (FX-6300).
| Feature | Core i5-10210Y | FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | UTFCBGA1377 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3 2133 MHz | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 10 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the FX-6300 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-10210Y) vs AMD-V (FX-6300). The Core i5-10210Y includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 615), while the FX-6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10210Y targets Mobile Low Power.
| Feature | Core i5-10210Y | FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mobile Low Power | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-10210Y and FX-6300
