Core i5-10210Y vs FX-6300

Core i5-10210Y vs FX-6300 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10210Y

4 / 8

4,131

0.0%

4,137

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10210Y vs FX-6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10210Y vs FX-6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10210Y

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 615, while FX-6300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,131 vs 4,137).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-6300.

FX-6300

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-10210Y.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10210Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $132 MSRP, while Core i5-10210Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10210Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-6300 better than Core i5-10210Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-10210Y is ahead with a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, FX-6300 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. FX-6300 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-6300 is the better buy right now. FX-6300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $132 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-10210Y is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (31.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible UTFCBGA1377 setup, Core i5-10210Y can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10210Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-10210Y vs FX-6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10210Y

The Core i5-10210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,131 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-6300

The FX-6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,137 points. Launch price was $132.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10210Y packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-6300 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i5-10210Y versus 3.8 GHz on the FX-6300 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-10210Y (base: 1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-10210Y uses the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6300 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10210Y scores 4,131 against the FX-6300's 4,137 — a 0.1% lead for the FX-6300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,079 vs 534, a 67.6% lead for the Core i5-10210Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10210Y vs 8192 kB on the FX-6300.

Feature	Core i5-10210Y	FX-6300
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+5%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	3.5 GHz+250%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8192 kB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	6144 kB+2300%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-Y (2019)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	4,131	4,137
Geekbench 6 Single	1,079+102%	534
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,380	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10210Y uses the UTFCBGA1377 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6300 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3 2133 MHz on the Core i5-10210Y versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-6300 — the Core i5-10210Y supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The FX-6300 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core i5-10210Y) vs 0 (FX-6300) — the Core i5-10210Y offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i5-10210Y) and AMD 990FX,AMD 970 (FX-6300).

Feature	Core i5-10210Y	FX-6300
Socket	UTFCBGA1377	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3 2133 MHz+14%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	10	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-6300 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-10210Y) vs AMD-V (FX-6300). The Core i5-10210Y includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 615), while the FX-6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10210Y targets Mobile Low Power.