Core i5-10210Y vs Pentium Gold G6400

Intel

Core i5-10210Y

4 Cores8 Thrd512 WWMax: 4 GHz2019
Core family
·
VS
Intel

Pentium Gold G6400

2 Cores4 Thrd58 WWMax: 4 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-10210Y vs Pentium Gold G6400 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10210Y vs Pentium Gold G6400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10210Y vs Pentium Gold G6400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10210Y

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 615, while Pentium Gold G6400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • 782.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 58W.

Pentium Gold G6400

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 58W instead of 512W, a 454W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10210Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (4,106 vs 4,131).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10210Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10210Y better than Pentium Gold G6400?
Yes. Core i5-10210Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10210Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10210Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-10210Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-10210Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Pentium Gold G6400 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium Gold G6400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-10210Y vs Pentium Gold G6400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-10210Y

The Core i5-10210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,131 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium Gold G6400

The Pentium Gold G6400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 4,106 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10210Y packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium Gold G6400 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-10210Y has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i5-10210Y versus 4 GHz on the Pentium Gold G6400 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-10210Y uses the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium Gold G6400 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10210Y scores 4,131 against the Pentium Gold G6400's 4,106 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-10210Y. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10210Y vs 4 MB (total) on the Pentium Gold G6400.

FeatureCore i5-10210YPentium Gold G6400
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4 GHz
Base Clock
1 GHz
4 GHz+300%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake-Y (2019)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
4,131
4,106
Geekbench 6 Single
1,079
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,380
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10210Y uses the UTFCBGA1377 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Gold G6400 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10210YPentium Gold G6400
Socket
UTFCBGA1377
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3 2133 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-10210Y) / not specified (Pentium Gold G6400). The Core i5-10210Y includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 615), while the Pentium Gold G6400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10210Y targets Mobile Low Power.

FeatureCore i5-10210YPentium Gold G6400
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Mobile Low Power