Core i5-10210Y vs FX-6200

Core i5-10210Y vs FX-6200 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10210Y

4 / 8

4,131

+0.4%

4,114

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10210Y vs FX-6200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10210Y vs FX-6200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10210Y

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 615, while FX-6200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌309.6% higher power demand at 512W vs 125W.

FX-6200

2012

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 125W instead of 512W, a 387W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10210Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,114 vs 4,131).
❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i5-10210Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10210Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10210Y better than FX-6200?

Yes. Core i5-10210Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10210Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10210Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10210Y is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-10210Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. FX-6200 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (24.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10210Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-10210Y vs FX-6200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10210Y

The Core i5-10210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,131 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-6200

The FX-6200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,114 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10210Y packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-6200 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i5-10210Y versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-6200 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the FX-6200 (base: 1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-10210Y uses the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6200 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10210Y scores 4,131 against the FX-6200's 4,114 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-10210Y. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10210Y vs 8192 kB on the FX-6200.

Feature	Core i5-10210Y	FX-6200
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock	1 GHz	3.8 GHz+280%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8192 kB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	6144 kB+2300%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-Y (2019)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	4,131	4,114
Geekbench 6 Single	1,079	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,380	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10210Y uses the UTFCBGA1377 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6200 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10210Y	FX-6200
Socket	UTFCBGA1377	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3 2133 MHz	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	10	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-10210Y) / not specified (FX-6200). The Core i5-10210Y includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 615), while the FX-6200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10210Y targets Mobile Low Power.