Core i3-7300T vs Core i5-10210Y

Intel

Core i3-7300T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-10210Y

4 Cores8 Thrd512 WWMax: 4 GHz2019
Core family
·

Core i3-7300T vs Core i5-10210Y Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7300T vs Core i5-10210Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7300T vs Core i5-10210Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7300T

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
  • 60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-10210Y.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10210Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Core i5-10210Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-10210Y

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (4,131 vs 4,145).
  • 1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-7300T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7300T better than Core i5-10210Y?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-10210Y is ahead with a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7300T pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Core i5-10210Y also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7300T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-7300T is the better buy right now. Core i3-7300T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-10210Y is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible UTFCBGA1377 setup, Core i5-10210Y can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10210Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-7300T vs Core i5-10210Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-7300T

The Core i3-7300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,145 points. Launch price was $147.

Intel

Core i5-10210Y

The Core i5-10210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,131 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i3-7300T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10210Y offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10210Y has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-7300T versus 4 GHz on the Core i5-10210Y — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10210Y (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Core i3-7300T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-10210Y uses Comet Lake-Y (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7300T scores 4,145 against the Core i5-10210Y's 4,131 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-7300T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,100 vs 1,079, a 1.9% lead for the Core i3-7300T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7300T vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10210Y.

FeatureCore i3-7300TCore i5-10210Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4 GHz+14%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+250%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Comet Lake-Y (2019)
PassMark
4,145
4,131
Geekbench 6 Single
1,100+2%
1,079
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,380
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7300T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10210Y uses UTFCBGA1377 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7300T versus LPDDR3 2133 MHz on the Core i5-10210Y — the Core i3-7300T supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7300T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-7300T) vs 10 (Core i5-10210Y) — the Core i3-7300T offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B250,H270,Z270,Q250,Q270 (Core i3-7300T) and SoC (Core i5-10210Y).

FeatureCore i3-7300TCore i5-10210Y
Socket
LGA1151
UTFCBGA1377
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+13%
LPDDR3 2133 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+300%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16+60%
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7300T) vs true (Core i5-10210Y). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7300T) and Intel UHD Graphics 615 (Core i5-10210Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7300T targets Low Power Desktop, Core i5-10210Y targets Mobile Low Power. Direct competitor: Core i3-7300T rivals Ryzen 3 2200GE.

FeatureCore i3-7300TCore i5-10210Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Low Power Desktop
Mobile Low Power