Core i3-7300T vs Opteron 3365

Core i3-7300T vs Opteron 3365 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-7300T

2 / 4

4,145

+0.5%

4,125

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7300T vs Opteron 3365 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7300T vs Opteron 3365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7300T

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Opteron 3365 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Opteron 3365.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 3365 across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 3365, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Opteron 3365 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Opteron 3365

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,125 vs 4,145).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-7300T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7300T better than Opteron 3365?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 3365 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-7300T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7300T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7300T is the better buy right now. Core i3-7300T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 3365 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 14.2% average FPS lead across 13 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-7300T vs Opteron 3365 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7300T

The Core i3-7300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,145 points. Launch price was $147.

Opteron 3365

The Opteron 3365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,125 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-7300T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 3365 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 3365 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-7300T versus 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 3365 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-7300T (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-7300T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 3365 uses Delhi (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7300T scores 4,145 against the Opteron 3365's 4,125 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-7300T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7300T vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 3365.

Feature	Core i3-7300T	Opteron 3365
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+6%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+52%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+6300%	4 MB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Delhi (2012−2013)
PassMark	4,145	4,125
Geekbench 6 Single	1,100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7300T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 3365 uses AM3+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-7300T	Opteron 3365
Socket	LGA1151	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7300T) / not specified (Opteron 3365). The Core i3-7300T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 3365 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7300T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7300T rivals Ryzen 3 2200GE.