
Core i3-7300T

Core i5-3340
Core i3-7300T vs Core i5-3340 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-7300T vs Core i5-3340 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Call of Duty: Warzone

Cyberpunk 2077

Deadlock

Dota 2

Elden Ring
Core i3-7300T vs Core i5-3340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-7300T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.0 vs 23.3 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 77W, a 42W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Core i5-3340 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,145 vs 4,249).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
Core i5-3340
2013Why buy it
- ✅+2.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 30.0 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
- ❌120% higher power demand at 77W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-7300T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-7300T better than Core i5-3340?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-7300T vs Core i5-3340 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7300T
The Core i3-7300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,145 points. Launch price was $147.

Core i5-3340
The Core i5-3340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,249 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7300T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3340 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-3340 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-7300T versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3340 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-7300T (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i3-7300T is built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-7300T scores 4,145 against the Core i5-3340's 4,249 — a 2.5% lead for the Core i5-3340. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7300T vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-3340.
| Feature | Core i3-7300T | Core i5-3340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+6% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+13% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 4,145 | 4,249+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,100 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7300T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3340 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-7300T | Core i5-3340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7300T) / not specified (Core i5-3340). The Core i3-7300T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-3340 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7300T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7300T rivals Ryzen 3 2200GE.
| Feature | Core i3-7300T | Core i5-3340 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-7300T was priced at $138, while the Core i5-3340 came in at $182. On launch pricing ($138 vs $182), Core i3-7300T was $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7300T delivers 30.0 pts/$ vs 23.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-3340 — making the Core i3-7300T the 25.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-7300T | Core i5-3340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-24% | $182 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.0+29% | 23.3 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















