Core i3-1110G4 vs Core i3-7300T

Both the Core i3-1110G4 and Core i3-7300T share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1110G4 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-7300T — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-1110G4 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-1110G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i3-7300T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1110G4 scores 4,160 against the Core i3-7300T's 4,145 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-1110G4. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,491 vs 1,100, a 30.2% lead for the Core i3-1110G4 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1110G4 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7300T.

The Core i3-1110G4 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-7300T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR4x-4267 memory speed. The Core i3-7300T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i3-1110G4) vs 16 (Core i3-7300T) — the Core i3-7300T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i3-1110G4 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU) (Core i3-1110G4) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7300T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1110G4 targets Thin & Light Laptop, Core i3-7300T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1110G4 rivals Ryzen 3 4300U; Core i3-7300T rivals Ryzen 3 2200GE.