PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1110G4 vs Core i3-7300T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1110G4 vs Core i3-7300T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1110G4

2020

Why buy it

✅+35.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-7300T.

Core i3-7300T

2017

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-1110G4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,100 vs 1,491).
❌Lower PassMark (4,145 vs 4,160).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Core i3-1110G4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-1110G4 better than Core i3-7300T?

Yes. Core i3-1110G4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-1110G4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1110G4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-1110G4 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-1110G4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-7300T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (30.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1110G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017), 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-1110G4 vs Core i3-7300T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1110G4

The Core i3-1110G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,160 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-7300T

The Core i3-7300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,145 points. Launch price was $147.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-1110G4 and Core i3-7300T share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1110G4 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-7300T — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-1110G4 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-1110G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i3-7300T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1110G4 scores 4,160 against the Core i3-7300T's 4,145 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-1110G4. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,491 vs 1,100, a 30.2% lead for the Core i3-1110G4 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1110G4 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7300T.

Feature	Core i3-1110G4	Core i3-7300T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+11%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.5 GHz+94%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	4,160	4,145
Geekbench 6 Single	1,491+36%	1,100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1110G4 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-7300T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i3-1110G4 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7300T — the Core i3-1110G4 supports 77.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7300T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i3-1110G4) vs 16 (Core i3-7300T) — the Core i3-7300T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-1110G4	Core i3-7300T
Socket	FCBGA1598	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4x-4267+78%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i3-1110G4 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU) (Core i3-1110G4) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7300T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1110G4 targets Thin & Light Laptop, Core i3-7300T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1110G4 rivals Ryzen 3 4300U; Core i3-7300T rivals Ryzen 3 2200GE.

Feature	Core i3-1110G4	Core i3-7300T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)	HD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Thin & Light Laptop	Low Power Desktop