Core i3-1110G4 vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Core i3-1110G4 vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G Performance Spectrum

Core i3-1110G4

2 / 4

4,160

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

2 / 4

4,162

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1110G4 vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1110G4 vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1110G4

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU), while Ryzen Embedded R1606G needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,160 vs 4,162).

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

2019

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-1110G4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1110G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R1606G better than Core i3-1110G4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-1110G4 is ahead with a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R1606G pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark. Core i3-1110G4 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R1606G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R1606G still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen Embedded R1606G comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1110G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1110G4 vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1110G4

The Core i3-1110G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,160 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

The Ryzen Embedded R1606G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,162 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-1110G4 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1110G4 versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-1110G4 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-1110G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1110G4 scores 4,160 against the Ryzen Embedded R1606G's 4,162 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1606G. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1110G4 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G.

Feature	Core i3-1110G4	Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+11%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	4,160	4,162
Geekbench 6 Single	1,491	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1110G4 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-1110G4	Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Socket	FCBGA1598	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4x-4267	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1110G4) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1606G). The Core i3-1110G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1110G4 targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1110G4 rivals Ryzen 3 4300U.