Core i3-1110G4 vs Xeon Gold 6230N

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1110G4 vs Xeon Gold 6230N FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1110G4 vs Xeon Gold 6230N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1110G4

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU), while Xeon Gold 6230N needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6230N across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,160 vs 4,175).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 28 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6230N, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.

Xeon Gold 6230N

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+358.3% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.

Trade-offs

❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1110G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6230N better than Core i3-1110G4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6230N makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-1110G4 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6230N is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6230N is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 358.3% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6230N still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6230N comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1110G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1110G4 vs Xeon Gold 6230N Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1110G4

The Core i3-1110G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,160 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon Gold 6230N

The Xeon Gold 6230N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 4,175 points. Launch price was $2,046.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1110G4 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6230N offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6230N has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1110G4 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6230N — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-1110G4 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-1110G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon Gold 6230N uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1110G4 scores 4,160 against the Xeon Gold 6230N's 4,175 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6230N. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1110G4 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6230N.

Feature	Core i3-1110G4	Xeon Gold 6230N
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	20 / 40+900%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+11%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.3 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	27.5 MB+358%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	20 MB+1500%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	4,160	4,175
Geekbench 6 Single	1,491	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1110G4 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6230N uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-1110G4	Xeon Gold 6230N
Socket	FCBGA1598	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4x-4267	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1110G4) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6230N). The Core i3-1110G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)), while the Xeon Gold 6230N requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1110G4 targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1110G4 rivals Ryzen 3 4300U.