Core i3-1110G4 vs FX-6300

Core i3-1110G4 vs FX-6300 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-1110G4

2 / 4

4,160

+0.6%

4,137

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1110G4 vs FX-6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1110G4 vs FX-6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1110G4

2020

Why buy it

✅+179.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU), while FX-6300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-6300.

FX-6300

2012

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-1110G4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (534 vs 1,491).
❌Lower PassMark (4,137 vs 4,160).
❌Launch MSRP is still $132 MSRP, while Core i3-1110G4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1110G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-1110G4 better than FX-6300?

Yes. Core i3-1110G4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-1110G4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1110G4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-1110G4 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-1110G4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $132 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. FX-6300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (31.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1110G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-1110G4 vs FX-6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1110G4

The Core i3-1110G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,160 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-6300

The FX-6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,137 points. Launch price was $132.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1110G4 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6300 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6300 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1110G4 versus 3.8 GHz on the FX-6300 — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-1110G4 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-1110G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the FX-6300 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1110G4 scores 4,160 against the FX-6300's 4,137 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-1110G4. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,491 vs 534, a 94.5% lead for the Core i3-1110G4 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1110G4 vs 8192 kB on the FX-6300.

Feature	Core i3-1110G4	FX-6300
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+3%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.5 GHz+94%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8192 kB+33%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	6144 kB+380%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	4,160	4,137
Geekbench 6 Single	1,491+179%	534

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1110G4 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the FX-6300 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i3-1110G4 versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-6300 — the Core i3-1110G4 supports 128.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i3-1110G4) vs 0 (FX-6300) — the Core i3-1110G4 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-1110G4	FX-6300
Socket	FCBGA1598	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4x-4267+129%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-6300 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i3-1110G4 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1110G4) vs AMD-V (FX-6300). The Core i3-1110G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)), while the FX-6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1110G4 targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1110G4 rivals Ryzen 3 4300U.