Core i5-10210Y vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Core i5-10210Y vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10210Y

4 / 8

4,131

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

2 / 4

4,162

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10210Y vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10210Y vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10210Y

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 615, while Ryzen Embedded R1606G needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,131 vs 4,162).
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10210Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10210Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R1606G better than Core i5-10210Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-10210Y is ahead with a 17.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R1606G pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core i5-10210Y also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R1606G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R1606G still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen Embedded R1606G comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R1606G is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i5-10210Y vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10210Y

The Core i5-10210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,131 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

The Ryzen Embedded R1606G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,162 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10210Y packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-10210Y has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i5-10210Y versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10210Y (base: 1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-10210Y uses the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10210Y scores 4,131 against the Ryzen Embedded R1606G's 4,162 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1606G. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10210Y vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G.

Feature	Core i5-10210Y	Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Cores / Threads	4 / 8+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+14%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.6 GHz+160%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-Y (2019)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	4,131	4,162
Geekbench 6 Single	1,079	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,380	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10210Y uses the UTFCBGA1377 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10210Y	Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Socket	UTFCBGA1377	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3 2133 MHz	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	10	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-10210Y) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1606G). The Core i5-10210Y includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 615), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10210Y targets Mobile Low Power.