GeForce 6200 vs Radeon RX 6300

NVIDIA

GeForce 6200

2019Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6300

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

GeForce 6200 vs Radeon RX 6300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6200 vs Radeon RX 6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6200 vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6200

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 10W instead of 35W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 115% HIGHER MSRP
    $129 MSRPvs$60 MSRP

Radeon RX 6300

2022

Why buy it

  • 5006.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $69 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Delivers 30807.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 250% higher power demand at 35W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 6300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5006.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 14275.7% in PassMark G3D (5,319 vs 37), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while GeForce 6200 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, and 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $69 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 30807.7% (88.7 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 6200 vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 6200

The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the Radeon RX 6300's 5,319 — the Radeon RX 6300 leads by 14275.7%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 6200Radeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score
37
5,319+14276%
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
384
768+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7972 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS+362%
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
2400 MHz+131%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
24
48+100%
L1 Cache
144 KB
256 KB+78%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce 6200 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce 6200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 6200Radeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6200 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 6300 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 6200) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 6200Radeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
4 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
64 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit+300%
32-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 6200Radeon RX 6300
DirectX
9.0c
12_2+33%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: PureVideo vs VCN 3.0.

FeatureGeForce 6200Radeon RX 6300
Encoder
No
VCN 3.0
Decoder
PureVideo
VCN 3.0
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 111.1% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce 6200Radeon RX 6300
TDP
10W-71%
35W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
160mm
Height
100mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
3.7
152.0+4008%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6200 came in at $129, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6300 was 53.5% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 6200) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 29466.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300 (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce 6200Radeon RX 6300
MSRP
$129
$60-53%
Performance per Dollar
0.3
88.7+29467%
Codename
GP108B
Navi 24
Release
February 20 2019
January 4 2022
Ranking
#643
#379

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.