GeForce 6200 vs Radeon RX 6300
GeForce 6200
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6200 is positioned at rank 734 and the Radeon RX 6300 is on rank 14, so the Radeon RX 6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14275.7% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6200.
| Insight | GeForce 6200 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-14275.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+14275.7%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+1500%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $40 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3493.9% better value per dollar than the GeForce 6200.
| Insight | GeForce 6200 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3493.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6200 and Radeon RX 6300
GeForce 6200
The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.
Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the Radeon RX 6300's 5,319 — the Radeon RX 6300 leads by 14275.7%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 37 | 5,319+14276% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 768+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 3.686 TFLOPS+362% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 2400 MHz+131% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 48+100% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 256 KB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce 6200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6200 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 6300 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 6200) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 4 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+300% | 32-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 12_2+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: PureVideo vs VCN 3.0.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 111.1% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-71% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 160mm |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7 | 152.0+4008% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6200 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60 and now averages $40. The GeForce 6200 costs 75% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.7 (GeForce 6200) vs 133.0 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 3494.6% better value. The Radeon RX 6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $60-53% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-75% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.7 | 133.0+3495% |
| Codename | GP108B | Navi 24 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #643 | #379 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 6200 and Radeon RX 6300
