FX-7600P
VS
Core i5-670

FX-7600P vs Core i5-670

AMD

FX-7600P

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i5-670

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 3.73 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-7600P is positioned at rank 939 and the Core i5-670 is on rank 1013, so the FX-7600P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-7600P

#927
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1721%
#928
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1696%
#929
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1557%
#930
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1550%
#931
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1535%
#933
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1483%
#934
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1422%
#935
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1419%
#936
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1381%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
97%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
96%
#950
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
96%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
96%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-670

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
34674%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
32763%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
23789%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7167%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5677%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4966%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2844%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2807%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2556%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2556%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2527%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2459%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2425%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2415%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2393%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
100%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
99%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
99%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
97%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
96%
#1020
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
96%
#1021
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
96%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
95%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
94%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
94%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
93%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
90%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-670 leads in gaming performance. However, the FX-7600P is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightFX-7600PCore i5-670
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($45)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the FX-7600P stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 55% cheaper ($45 vs $100) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightFX-7600PCore i5-670
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+123%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($45)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-7600P and Core i5-670

AMD

FX-7600P

The FX-7600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,557 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-670

The Core i5-670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.46 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $252.

Processing Power

The FX-7600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-670 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-7600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the FX-7600P versus 3.73 GHz on the Core i5-670 — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-670 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.46 GHz). The FX-7600P uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-670 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-7600P scores 2,557 against the Core i5-670's 2,553 — a 0.2% lead for the FX-7600P.

FeatureFX-7600PCore i5-670
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.73 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.46 GHz+28%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,557
2,553
Geekbench 6 Single
638
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-7600P uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-670 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-7600PCore i5-670
Socket
FP3
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-7600P) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-670). The Core i5-670 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the FX-7600P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-670 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-670 rivals Phenom II X4 955.

FeatureFX-7600PCore i5-670
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-7600P launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core i5-670 debuted at $284. At current prices ($45 vs $100), the FX-7600P is $55 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-7600P delivers 56.8 pts/$ vs 25.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-670 — making the FX-7600P the 76% better value option.

FeatureFX-7600PCore i5-670
MSRP
$150-47%
$284
Avg Price (30d)
$45-55%
$100
Performance per Dollar
56.8+123%
25.5
Release Date
2014
2010